Abstact:..art can be created by single cell animals and as such should not be purchased for money.

Contents: Aside from the fact that I am refering to a nonexistant entity, paradoxs do not exist for the simple reason that I made the statement. The fact of my arrogance is irrelavent to the matter; arrogance cannot change numerical values, or anything of importance in this or any other of the twelve known universes, exception of course only irrelavent consequences such as of or related to money. Also and therefore motives cannot change established physical constants, and furthermore my arrogance proves this statement because of my purely unhypocritical standings as related to strawman techniques.

As paradoxs do exist in the delusions of thosse sad (financially challenged) individuals who claim the reality of such non-existing entities and "proofs" stated by such individuals only tend to disrupt the ongoing bias nature of the scientific community then it is only in the interest of my well being that I address the issue. I refer my honorable friend to the statements I made previously.

"What if paradoxs existed?" sceptics claim, but the very fact that this document exists attesting to the contrary is proof enough that they do not. In fact, a paradox, if it's worth its weight in philosophers (and they tend to be a heavy lot) must be self referencial and definately this paper does not, not that anyone was claiming that it was, which should prove it to not to be such.

Summary: I should be paid a healthy sum for confusing the issues and generally wasting space like a good professor of philosophy with a comfy fellowship to fall back on. (By the way, everything in this paper is lie meant to make the reader think himself into a neurological frenzy).

Dr. Macy PL.D
8 June 1992.1