Other Papers
by Dr. Macy
Universe 11/92

Groorg 03/96

Principles 09/91

Cabbage 06/92

[Long title] 06/92

Paradoxs 06/92

Primal BHT 06/92

The Principles of Perpendicular Logic Based in Classical Logic

Abstact: In order to fully understand the true import of what will be of coherent understanding upon the topic of this paper, namely the explination of why this abstract is so similar in nature to other abstracts, it must be pre-presented in an abstract format such as this.

Contents: Classical logic is built, much to the dismay of its many advocates, on several assumptions. By utilizing classical inductive precesses ad obsurdum it can be hypothesized that the first, ignoring relativistic causality paradox theory (which is dealt with in Neuroeinstienology, the study of Einstien's brain through disectional slices subjected to random electrical impulses) assumption is, formally: The ability to assume must be assumed.

In other words the very foundation of "classical" logic is built into a framework most condusive to studies in the perpendicular realm. So, in fact, perpendicular logic is not only based in Classical logic but, the inverse, Classical logic is based in Perpendicular logic is also true. And if the principles of absolute Truism are applied to both side of the word sylogism classical logic cancels and the only thing left is perpendicular logic.

It seems then that the entire gist of reality, or non-reality depending on the observer's inertial reference frame, proves the unacceptibility and self contrainess of any classical observation. Unfortunately that would mean that you couldn't possibly be reading this at this instant in time (unless, perhaps you lived next door to a black hole). But if time isn't really classical what difference does it make? Appearently more research needs to be done (money $$ ching, ching).

Dr. Macy PL.D
18 September 1991